What Does derive coulomb's as a special case of guass law Mean?

When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only accomplished If your employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as a result they were properly aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It can be properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this component for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

Generally, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (which includes All those in distinct violation of founded case law) on the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, as well as case is not appealed, the decision will stand.

The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Obviously distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion will involve a transfer to a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, over the other hand, supplies financial relief by positioning an employee inside a higher shell out scale, without switching their occupation duties or position. It is a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained in the same shell out scale for a lengthy time, particularly when they lack options for promotion. Upgradation is usually a policy tool used to relieve the hardship of very long-term stagnation. Read more

Generally speaking, higher courts tend not to have direct oversight over the lessen courts of record, in that they cannot get to out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments in the lessen courts.

The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were advised in the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Harmless with him in their home. The therapist assured them that they'd very little to fret about.

In case you find an error within the written content of the published opinion (such as a misspelled name or simply a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW

In certain jurisdictions, case regulation might be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family law.

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police is to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, guarantee legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair on the offender as well as the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The existence of this power casts an obligation about the police, plus they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its several pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are required to protect and never abduct. Read more

The different roles of case legislation in civil and common law traditions create differences in the best way that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and sometimes interpret the broader legal principles.

seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the uncovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication more info before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession on the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this facet for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, it is also a effectively-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.